PlatformProductsIGA and lifecycleSSO and password mgmtPrivileged accessSoD and GRCSensitive transaction monitoringCompliance and pharma GxPSAP security suiteSAP UI data protectionERP securityP2P and O2C controlsDatabase securityLicence optimisationConnector factoryATS AI

Solutions

Pharma & Life SciencesFinancial ServicesManufacturingAll IndustriesSAP IntegrationOracle IntegrationAll IntegrationsCompare Platform

Resources

Blog & InsightsIGA + GRC Capability BriefPlatform OverviewAI Governance Whitepaper

Company

About UsPartnersContact UsPlatform Overview
Get demo
← All Resources
Platform

IGA vs GRC vs PAM — When You Need a Unified Platform

2026-02-20 · 8 min read

Point tools for IGA, GRC, and PAM create integration debt, duplicate identity data, and audit evidence gaps. A unified platform shares one warehouse and one evidence trail.

The three-layer model

IGA governs who has access and lifecycle. GRC governs whether that access creates risk and compliance violations. PAM governs elevated access with forensic proof. Each layer depends on the same identity and entitlement truth.

Cost of separation

Separate tools mean duplicate connectors, inconsistent role definitions, and evidence scattered across systems. Remediation in GRC does not automatically update IGA assignments. PAM sessions are disconnected from SoD violations.

AI Tech Secure unifies all three on the Combine Portal orchestration layer with shared identity warehouse, ATS AI, and consolidated audit export.

Related platform areas

Platform OverviewCompare
Discuss this topic with our team →